IDF Prepares for US-Iran Conflict Scenarios Amid Vance-Led Talks
Israel is readying operations for a potential US offensive or Iranian surprise attack as diplomatic efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz continue alongside limited airstrikes.
By Grace Sullivan ·

The Israel Defense Forces have finalized plans for two major escalation scenarios involving Iran, moving to maintain high alert levels while US Vice President JD Vance pushes for a diplomatic resolution. The military is preparing for the possibility that negotiations will fail, leading to either a large-scale American strike or a sudden Iranian counterattack.
The first scenario envisions the United States launching an aggressive offensive against Iranian national infrastructure and military facilities to end the conflict quickly. The second involves Iran executing a surprise assault on American interests across the Middle East, including IDF bases that host US personnel and aircraft. IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir has held recent assessments with senior officers to validate these operational plans.
Air Force Commander Maj.-Gen. Omer Tishler and Operations Directorate head Maj.-Gen. Itzik Cohen skipped the IDF Commanders' Championship to focus on these preparations. The assessments cover a range of responses to ensure readiness for a surprise attack, including the possibility that regional adversaries join the conflict through coordination or miscalculation.
US forces have conducted limited strikes against Iranian military assets in the south and around the Strait of Hormuz in recent days. These operations targeted air defense systems and missile launchers on Qeshm Island, with additional reports of strikes on Larak Island. Iranian forces have retaliated against American vessels and assets in the region, though the full extent of the strikes has not been independently confirmed.
The diplomatic track focuses on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and restoring nuclear inspections in exchange for lifting the US blockade and releasing frozen Iranian assets. Israeli officials assess that President Donald Trump prefers a deal over confrontation, but they believe Tehran views this preference for diplomacy as weakness. Security analysts say Iran is likely to prolong talks rather than rush to sign an agreement, viewing the November 3 US midterm election results as political revenge against the White House.
On November 1, two days before the midterm elections, senior Israeli security officials reviewed a proposal for a preemptive Israeli offensive against Iran. The Mossad chief reportedly supported the idea, but officials said they dropped the option quickly. "The option was raised and then dropped just as quickly," officials stated, adding that the discussion was professional and respectful without disproportionate arguments.
Officials characterized leaks from the November 1 meeting as politically motivated, rejecting claims that the debate was heated. They emphasized that the military remains focused on operational readiness while diplomatic contacts continue, balancing the risk that limited exchanges could escalate despite ongoing efforts to reach an agreement.






